Dead Ringers (1988)

What does it mean to watch a Cronenberg film? When his name is said to most cinefiles they think of body horror. He was the master at creating creatures stemming out of people or awesome practical effects. The Fly (1986) and Scanners (1981) both dealt with type of changes within a body to create something more than just a human body. But in the late 80's he made a film that surprisingly doesn't have that many practical effects. Dead Ringers (1988) delves into something that we don't view as anything different. He decided to tackle the subject of twins and the possible effects that one could affect the other.

The plot of the film centers around a pair of identical twin brothers, Beverly and Elliot Mantel (both portrayed by Jeremy Irons) and their involvement with one of their patients Claire Niveau (Genevieve Bujold). They are brilliant gynecologists and have won awards based on their research and contribution to the field. Beverly is the more studious and lonely type while Elliot is the confident, outgoing type. Both brothers although identical in looks could not be more different in personality, which Irons brings his all to the table to show.  Elliot becomes entranced with Claire when she comes in for a check up, not only because she is a famous television star but also because she has three uteri. For the brothers this is something that is extremely unheard of and almost never seen. After Elliot has a one night stand with Claire he passes her off to his brother. Beverly pretends to be his brother throughout their relationship but when their rouge comes to an end, she breaks up with him. This is only the beginning of a downward spiral that envelops both brothers into a true Shakespearean type ending. 

Now as I said before this film has almost zero body horror compared to typical Cronenberg fashion. As for a few parts within the film, the characteristics of what we have come to expect aren't there. The film solely relies on the characters that he creates.  It's no question that Irons carries the film by his amazing work. But something about their interaction with both the outside world and their inner struggle makes the movie quite mesmerizing. But the only problem with that is that sometimes Cronenberg because so obsessed with explaining and fleshing out his characters that it feels to run on.

Although the movie is only 116 minutes, around the middle of the film it felt as nothing was happening. It wasn't until Beverly started to truly drift into madness that the film picked up again. Just wait until he makes the "mutant" gynecology  equipment and then you will understand. But I feel like the ending also abruptly happened as well. While the film felt like it was building up to this huge climactic ending, it was really only a murmur instead of an earthquake. The ending was quite predictable as well, but what came was not as extravagant as his earlier movies. It basically finished in a whisper compared to The Fly which ended with a shotgun blast to the head.

It was nice to see the versatility of what Cronenberg can do, but it felt like the film just ran on for a bit too long. Still Irons held the movie together and made it interesting enough that you won't be bored out of your mind. Still a entertaining watch but don't expect a happy ending while watching this.

Grade: B

Genre: Drama

Cast: Jeremy Irons, Genevieve Bujold

Rated R: Strong sexuality/ nudity, disturbing content, language and drug use

Directed by: David Cronenberg

I'm Your Friend Till' The Very End: 30 Years of CHILD'S PLAY

The earliest dolls were made of clay, stone, wood, ivory, leather or wax. Wooden dolls have been discovered in ancient Egyptian tombs dating back to the early 21st century B.C. Dolls are used in certain rituals like voodoo and have even been 'possessed', like the doll inspiring the Annabelle films. One thing they all have in common - is how creepy they are. The way that their lifeless black eyes look at you, never blinking, boring a hole straight into your soul, all with a terrifying grin. They have scared children and adults for many years - but it was in 1988 when a cultural icon in the form of a doll was built. His name was Chucky and we are, of course, talking about the 1988 classic: Child's Play.

In Child's Play, single mother Karen (Catherine Hicks) is looking to buy a very popular doll for her son Andy (Alex Vincent). Unable to locate one in any toy store, she buys one from a homeless man in a dark alley. Unbeknownst to her, the doll has been possessed by the soul of recently deceased serial killer Charles Lee Ray (Brad Dourif), also known as Chucky. Now, Chucky wants to get back into a human body before he's stuck in the doll's body forever. Since Andy was the first person he revealed his true identity to, his is the only body he can inhabit.

The Birth of Chucky

Child's Play started out as an entirely different film in the original drafts by writer Don Mancini. In the original draft, Andy Barclay was the antagonist. The film more resembled David Cronenberg's The Brood (1979). Andy was going to make a blood pact with "Buddy" the doll, and while Andy was asleep, the doll was going to come to life and take revenge on the people Andy's subconscious despised. Ultimately, If Andy was responsible for everyone's death, audiences would have had a different response to the film. People would have protested (more than they already did). Even though the finished product of Child's Play turned out different, it still maintains some of the original qualities of that idea. 

Mancini also wanted to delve further into the effects of advertising on children with Child's Play. Andy is shown in the beginning of the film watching a "Good Guys" television show filled with Good Guy marketing. Andy also wears "Good Guy" clothing in every scene. Before Karen buys the doll from the homeless man, she buys accessories for the doll, even though he doesn't even own the doll yet. Everyone in this universe is addicted to the consumerism of the eighties. Even though the film wasn't centered on this fact, like Mancini originally wanted, it is still heavily implied.

THEMES

Now, it's no surprise that one of the major themes throughout this film surrounds motherhood and family. Andy's father is hardly spoken about in the film, except for the fact that he has died. This is one of the main reasons why everyone believes that Andy has such an attachment to the doll. Just like in The Exorcist (1973), when the doctors blame Regan's behavior on a lack of a father figure in her life. Both films feature very strong mothers, who eventually start to believe their children. Child's Play shows how even a single parent still has the power to save and raise a child. She was willing to blow off the head, leg and arm of a killer doll for her son. That's love.

Throughout the rest of the film, Andy starts to mimic Chucky. Best example would be after Chucky kills Maggie. Karen asks what has Chucky been saying to Andy. His response is "Maggie was a real bitch and got what she deserved." Karen's horrified by his casual use of curse words but also by the lack of empathy for Maggie just being killed. In reality this young child is being corrupted by a
murderer.

RECEPTION

Child's Play started terrifying everyone on November 9th, 1988, just in times for the holidays. It made $44 million dollars worldwide at the box office off of a budget of only $9 million dollars. The film had good reviews with a total of 57 metascore and a 67% on rottentomatoes.com. Roger Ebert gave it three stars saying "A cheerfully energetic horror film of the slam-bang school, but slicker and more clever than most, about an evil doll named Charles Lee Ray, or Chucky." Of course a sequel was greenlit and came out two years later to the day. Since then there has been five more sequels for a total of seven in the total series.

ICON

Chucky's presence of being an actual animated doll doesn't even come to fruition until about the forty minute mark of a eighty-seven minute movie. But with a cultural icon such as Chucky, most people know who he is. He has now made appearances at many occasions over the years included the first annual Horror Hall of Fame, Saturday Night Live, USA Today, the Superbowl and his latest was in the Spielberg film Ready Player One (2018). With a reboot in the works, it seems that Chucky is really going to be our friend till' the end.

How old were you when you first saw Childs Play? Does it still scare you? Will Chucky forever haunt you? Let us know in the comments below!

Nightmare on Elm Street (2010)

There is no disputing that the original Nightmare on Elm Street (1984) is a classic. Wes Craven did a spectacular job at taking what we hold sacred, which is of course our sleep, and made us terrified of it. He made us afraid to sleep or the burned man will take his revenge.

In 2010 though, Hollywood thought that we were due for Freddy Kruger to hit the big screen again. His last time on the big screen was in 2004 with Freddy VS. Jason and his last solo movie was in 1994 with Wes Craven's New Nightmare. 

If you have never seen or heard of the plot of A Nightmare film, it is about a bunch of kids who whenever they go to sleep start to see a burned man, in a green and red sweater and a glove with knives on it. Eventually the character, known as Freddy, starts to kill them in their dreams which then kills them in real life.

The remake keeps some of the same themes and elements but also expands on a lot of them. For instance, and this will be a SPOILER ALERT. They decided to make him a full blown pedofile. In the original he was a a child murderer pedofile who was let free on a technicality but in this one they went all out with the sick factor, including some of the dialogue as well as showing some pictures he took of the kids (out of focus). This turn for the character was okay but I do not think that it was necessarily needed. It was better to leave the viewer with an imagination of what he did instead of putting the social commentary on justice against pedofiles up front.

Jackie Earle Hayley (Watchman, Shutter Island) does a decent job at playing Freddy but Robert Englund ruined the roll. The rest of the actors in it are just there, not necessarily bringing anything to the story. The audience is just waiting for the next person to die, you just don't care about any of the characters. But that is what these new remakes were trying to accomplish. A high body count with no substance.

There isn't really much to this movie. If I were to choose whether to watch this or the original it is really no contest. But if you are looking to have something on that includes gory deaths as you are making dinner, then feel free to watch this. I only wish that if they are going to try and reboot the franchise again, that they try an add a little more back into the story, make the characters actual characters and create a film that is not only fun but has substance as well.

Grade: D

Genre: Horror

Cast: Jackie Earle Hayley, Rooney Mara, Kyle Gallner

Rated: R for strong bloody horror violence, disturbing images, terror and language

Director: Samuel Bayer